Sunday May 13, 2012, Sunday
Times
CP’s stance on
implementation of LLRC proposals
Scrap Concurrent List, distribute only State land to landless, give limited police powers to Governors By Anthony David
Scrap Concurrent List, distribute only State land to landless, give limited police powers to Governors By Anthony David
Scrapping of the
Concurrent List to the 13th Amendment, a proposal on distributing land in the
Provinces and putting on hold the vesting of police powers to the Provincial
Councils are among the highlights of the Communist Party proposals put forward
to the Government.
|
The proposals have
been put forward after the Government sought the views of the constituent
parties of the United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA) on the implementation of
the proposals in the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission
(LLRC).Communist Party General Secretary D.E.W.Gunasekara told the Sunday Times
that the party believes the issue of the devolution of powers is already
included in the 13th Amendment and the party cannot go beyond the 13th
Amendment.
He said the party
proposals have called for the scrapping of the Concurrent List and vesting the
powers either with the respective Provincial Council or with the central
government. On its suggestions regarding the LLRC report the party has taken up
the position that some of the proposals have already been implemented, some
were being implemented, some proposals are yet to be implemented while some
were related to controversial issues such as the political solution, where there
is no consensus and deeper discussion is needed, he said.
“The land issue has
been raised, but it’s only imaginary. We have made suggestions to formulate a
policy and this will be only in respect of State land and not private land,” he
said. He said according to his party proposal State land should be distributed
to the landless and top priority given to the people in the district itself.
“The next preference
should be given to those living in the adjoining district. The last is where
there is an excess population in a district where they could be accommodated.
But this should be done in a manner it does not upset the demography and ethnic
balance. This should be acceptable to all communities,” he said.
Mr. Gunasekara said
that a similar policy was formulated during the tenure of former Prime Minister
Dudley Senanayake as well. “Regarding police powers what we have noted is it is
controversial. Let them remain with the State for the moment. Today’s political
culture does not permit the distribution of police powers to the electorate or
provinces. People do not like it. I personally do not like police powers being
given to a chief minister, because he will misuse them,” he said.
“We have no
objections to police powers regarding traffic laws and petty thefts being
vested. Even today it could be done. They could be administered through the
Governor as a safeguard,” he said.
“On the political solution, from our past experience the bilateral talks will not carry us anywhere. The two major parties – the UNP and SLFP - should reach a consensus. You can never solve the problem if there is going to be confrontation between the major parties,” he added.
“On the political solution, from our past experience the bilateral talks will not carry us anywhere. The two major parties – the UNP and SLFP - should reach a consensus. You can never solve the problem if there is going to be confrontation between the major parties,” he added.
“The Tamil parties
should be drawn into the discussion. You must get media support for such a
peace process,” he said. Regarding the question of human rights, media freedom
and the right to information mentioned in the LLRC, he said the party was in
favour and had no reservations.