Monday, December 24, 2012

Agents to hire more Sri Lankan maids next year



By Saifulbahri Ismail | Posted: 22 December 2012 1731 hrs | Channel News Asia
SINGAPORE: Maid agents in Singapore are looking to hire more foreign domestic helpers from Sri Lanka.
From next year, the Association of Employment Agencies plans to bring in between 500 and 1,000 Sri Lankan maids a month, up from the current 100 to 200 a month.
Based on records from the Sri Lankan High Commission in Singapore, there are about 4,500 Sri Lankan maids here.
The association said this will help to make up for the shortfall in maids from traditional source countries, such as Indonesia and Philippines.
It will be signing an agreement with Sri Lankan authorities and employment agencies next month to facilitate the recruitment of maids.
The move to bring in more domestic helpers from Sri Lanka is part of efforts to improve the quality of domestic helpers here.
Most of the Sri Lankan maids speak English and have at least 10 years of education. About 40 per cent of them have 'A' level qualifications.
Employment agencies here said it is important to make Singapore an attractive destination for Sri Lankan women hoping to work as domestic helpers overseas.
K Jayaprema, the president of the Association of Employment Agencies said: "It's very important that when we are reviving this new market, we don't want it to go wrong because we are focusing on attracting quality FDWs (foreign domestic workers) to Singapore and for that to happen, we need to have good employment terms, the welfare of the domestic workers have to be taken care of and it must be attractive for them to come in."
A J Razzy, director of maid agency Cobb Douglas said: "There are some things that have changed for example, with the scrapping of the entry test, there are many more opportunities for agents at Sri Lanka to recruit Sri Lankan foreign domestic workers for the Singapore market."

The association is working with Sri Lankan authorities to spell out training requirements for maids, and speed up the hiring process.
Sri Lanka has an extensive training programme of more than 20 days for maids.
Singapore maid agents would like the programme to focus more on aspects such as household skills and safety.
Ms Jayaprema said that the processing time for recruitment of these maids could be faster.

The Association of Employment Agencies led a delegation of 30 maid agents to Sri Lanka recently to renew contacts with their counterparts.
It met with the Sri Lankan Bureau for Foreign Employment, which is the regulatory body for overseas recruitment of workers, and the Sri Lankan Foreign Employment Agency.

In addition, the association met over 60 Sri Lankan recruitment agencies. The last time the association organised a visit there was in 2007.
Maid agents say Sri Lankan workers can between S$400 and S$500 a month.
Sri Lanka is the fifth biggest source of maids in Singapore after Indonesia, the Philippines, India and Myanmar.
A recent report from the National Population and Talent Division forecast that Singapore is going to need some 100,000 more maids by 2030.
Muniyandi Vasanthakumari has been working as a domestic helper in Singapore for 15 years. The 45-year-old Sri Lankan is happy here and gets along well with her employer's family.
"She reads what we want, she knows our preference and she does it beforehand. Before I can tell her what I need, it's already done," said her employer Komathi Anbalahan.

Minister: Iran Keen to Boost Judicial Cooperation with Sri Lanka



TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian Justice Minister Seyed Morteza Bakhtiari said Iran is ready to take effective steps to further expand mutual cooperation with Sri Lanka in judicial fields.


"Given the existence of grounds for the promotion of interactions between the two countries of Iran and Sri Lanka, we can have effective interactions with each other not only in the extradition of criminals but also in other judicial and civil issues," Bakhtiari said in a meeting with his Sri Lankan counterpart Rauff Hakeem here in Tehran on Saturday.
Bakhtiari said Iran's judicial apparatus is prepared to arrange training courses for Sri Lankan legal experts in a bid to transfer its legal experiences to the South Asian state.
Bakhtiari further underlined the necessity for Iran and Sri Lanka to play an active role to establish an international court of justice in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) as international legal centers have not acted properly to defend the oppressed nations.
Earlier this month, Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi in a meeting with Sri Lankan Minister of Industry and Commerce Rishad Bathiyutheen underlined Tehran's readiness to further develop relations and cooperation with Colombo in different fields.
"The Islamic Republic of Iran is fully ready for supporting and evermore expansion of comprehensive cooperation with Sri Lanka, particularly in political, economic, commercial, transit, and joint investments fields," Salehi said in Tehran at the time.
Bathiyutheen, for his part, appreciated the Iranian officials for their assistance in the process of his country's development, and expressed the hope that the level of commercial and economic cooperation with the Islamic Republic of Iran, particularly in energy field, would increase.

Eelam lobbyists in Australia can tarnish Sri Lanka’s image before CHOGM



  • By  The Nation
  • Sunday, 23 December 2012 00:00
The average Sri Lankan, if questioned about Sri Lanka-Australia ties last week would have alluded to the on-going, closely fought Test cricket series between the two countries. Most of them would have heard of Australian cricket captain Michael Clarke, but not of Bob Carr.
Carr, the Australian Foreign Minister visited Colombo last week but he hardly captured the imagination of the media engrossed in the drama surrounding the impeachment of Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake. However, his visit was an extremely significant event.
Since the conclusion of the Eelam war in 2009, it has almost become a tradition for western nations led by the United States and the United Kingdom to castigate Sri Lanka for alleged human rights violations during the final stages of the conflict.
This campaign reached a climax early this year when the United States sponsored a resolution at the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva against Sri Lanka. While most western countries indulged in this practice of Sri Lanka bashing, Australia didn’t.
The reason for most western nations to campaign against Sri Lanka was that these countries have formidable Eelamist lobbies which wield considerable influence on the powers that be in those countries to take up causes related to Tamil separatism.
It is not that Australia does not possess such groups. That country’s main cities, Sydney and Melbourne provide a safe haven for many Eelamists who are not shy to voice their sentiments supporting the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
However, the government in Canberra headed by Prime Minister Julia Gillard has been keen to maintain cordial relations with Colombo, even when Australia’s allies in the western world and the Commonwealth took up positions against Sri Lanka.
A case in point is when the last Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) was held in Perth last year. With the next CHOGM due to be held in Hambantota in 2013, there were widespread calls for Australia to endorse a proposed boycott of the next summit.
That did not happen. Instead, when President Mahinda Rajapaksa visited Perth, instructions went out to provide maximum security to him to prevent embarrassing incidents he had to endure such as the cancellation of a scheduled speech while visiting Britain.
Another incident which could have strained relations with Australia was the alleged ‘abduction’ of Kumar Gunaratnam, the leader of the Frontline Socialist Party in April. Sri Lanka allowed Gunaratnam, an Australian citizen, to return to Sydney without pressing charges against him.
Diplomatic relations between the two countries may have been helped by such events, but this is not the main reason why Australia is keen to treat Sri Lanka as a friend and an ally rather than an adversary. In recent years, thousands of Sri Lankans have been arriving in Australia’s shores as refugees smuggled in boats. Thereafter they seek refuge in that country as ‘asylum seekers’. Until recently, they stayed in Australia for years until their ‘asylum’ claims were processed.
This is a major political issue in Australia. Prime Minister Gillard, scoring low on the popularity stakes, has been accused of being ‘soft’ on asylum policies. Now, Gillard has ordered such asylum seekers to be sent to other countries until their claims are assessed.
Because of this, Australian authorities are keen to stop boatloads of asylum seekers arriving there. Significantly, Canberra has realized that most such Lankan asylum seekers are not refugees fleeing ethnic persecution, but bounty hunters seeking better economic prospects.
Most of Bob Carr’s time in Sri Lanka last week was spent on discussing with Lankan authorities the measures that can be jointly undertaken to curb the flow of refugees from Sri Lanka -and this included assistance to the Sri Lankan Navy to patrol and monitor the seas.  
This issue presents Colombo with an opportunity to forge close diplomatic ties with Australia just as much as the CHOGM scheduled to be held in Hambantota is a chance to showcase Sri Lanka to the world not only as tourist destination but also as a vibrant democracy. While Australia remains friendly, the same cannot be said of the CHOGM summit. Canadian Prime Stephen Harper has threatened to boycott the summit. There are reports that the British government may request Queen Elizabeth, the head of the Commonwealth, not to attend.
Thus Sri Lanka’s status as host of the CHOGM is a double edged sword. While it provides Colombo a chance to redeem itself, it must be aware that the Eelam lobby based in the West will be keen to exploit the summit to tarnish the country’s image.
Recent developments including the impeachment saga can only help them. It is a reality that Colombo must accept and act accordingly. If not, the CHOGM may become a diplomatic disaster for Sri Lanka and its reputation could be in tatters by this time, next year. 

UN classifies Lankans for refugee status



Sunday Times | 23.12.12
Journalists, gays, lesbians, suspected LTTE supporters favoured; but warns of armed forces personnel
The United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) has listed persons suspected of LTTE links, journalists, opposition politicians, political activists, and gays and lesbians, as being among the categories of Sri Lankans “likely to be in need of international refugee protection.”
On the other hand, UNHCR also advises that applications by persons such as members of the armed forces be carefully considered.
It says this is in light of “documented human rights violations and transgressions of international humanitarian law by all parties during the three-decade long armed conflict, in addition to alleged serious human rights abuses post-conflict”
The recommendations are published in the 2012 ‘UNHCR Eligibility Guidelines for Assessing the International Protection needs of Asylum-Seekers from Sri Lanka’. It was released on Friday.
The guidelines are aimed at helping decision-makers and governments to assess applications for asylum.
The last guidelines for Sri Lanka were issued in 2010. This year’s document says it has taken into account the current situation in the country where “ongoing human rights concerns are reported, including in particular with regard to reports of post-conflict justice, torture and mistreatment, disappearances, arbitrary detention and freedom of expression”.
It says all claims lodged by Sri Lanka asylum-seekers “need to be considered on their own merits” More specifically, it adds, the possible risks facing individuals with profiles specified in the document “require particularly careful examination”.
“UNHCR considers that individuals with these profiles – though this list is not exhaustive – may be, and in some cases are likely to be in need of international refugee protection, depending on the individual circumstances of their case,” it states.
The categories are persons suspected of certain links with the LTTE; certain opposition politicians and political activists; certain journalists and other media professionals; certain human rights activists; certain witnesses of human rights violations and victims of human rights violations seeking justice; women in certain circumstances; children in certain circumstances; and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) individuals in certain circumstances.
With regards to categories whose applications need close perusal, UNHCR says “exclusion considerations under Article 1F of the 1951 (Refugee) Convention may arise in individual claims by asylum-seekers from Sri Lanka”.
Article 1F states that the provisions of the Refugee Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that he has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity; has committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to his admission to that country as a refugee; has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN.
The Sri Lanka country guidelines state, therefore, that careful consideration must be given, in particular, to certain (former) Government officials, including in functions with responsibilities relating to the conduct of war during the final phases of the conflict, and those posted in the conflict-affected areas during the final phase of the conflict.
Also in this category are certain (former) members of the Sri Lankan Army and other security forces; certain (former) members of the police, including the Criminal Investigation Division (CID), the Terrorist Investigation Department (TID), and the Special Task Force (STF); certain former members of the LTTE, in particular former combatants; certain (former) members of the ‘Tamil Makkal Viduthali Pulikal’ (TMVP), including the Karuna faction and the Inya Barathi Group.
The UNHCR has cautioned further on applications from certain (former) members of the Eelam People’s Democratic Party (EPDP); certain (former) members of the People’s Liberation Organisation of Tamil Eelam (PLOTE); and certain (former) members of other pro- and anti-government militias and paramilitary groups.