- Written by Gamini Gunawardane
- Sunday, 03 June 2012 00:00
In his recent speech in Parliament reported in ‘Tamil Tiger
Terrorism’ in Sri Lanka ‘The Island’ of March 15, Mr. Sumanthiran had
stated among other things referring to the publication of a book titled
‘Gota’s War,’ as follows: “ Sir, the subtitle says ‘the crushing of
Tamil Tiger Terrorism in Sri Lanka’. It says’ Tamil Tiger Terrorism in
Sri Lanka’. Tamil equals Tiger equals terrorist………………. I am talking
about the language used. You say ‘Tamil Tiger Terrorist’ (he repeats).
Tamil equals Tiger equals terrorist”. And then he goes on to say, “That
kind of mindset will never advance any kind of reconciliation in this
country,” etc.Now it appears to me that this interpretation is skewed to say the
least if not communally motivated. I am reminded here what a former IGP
asserted in answer to a question at a press conference: “Indeed all
Tamils are not ‘Tiger Terrorists’, but it so happens that all Tiger
Terrorists are Tamils.” Here lies the subtle difference. To take the
matter further, during the JVP insurrections of 1971 and later in 88/89,
the participants were described as JVP terrorists. They were not
referred to as ‘Sinhala JVP Terrorists’ because unlike the ‘Tamil Tiger
Terrorists’ they were not fighting for a separate state for the
Sinhalese or any other communal cause.In fact they were referred to as ‘Che Guevara Kalliya’ by the
villagers because they were supposed to have been rebelling to usher a
radical socialist state. To explain the matter still further, I recall
that during the ’71 Insurgency when a Police or Army mobile patrol
stopped people on the road on suspicion in places like Vavunia, all that
the Tamil youngsters did was, throw up their arms and declare: “Ayya,
Nan Thamil aal”. That was all the password required and off they went.
Besides, what control does a government or any other agency have in
determining what terms a free writer should use in describing the title
of his book?
“Rata watakara weta bendath Kata watakara weta bandinta behe”
meaning “even if you could fence the whole country you cannot fence
round the mouth!” That is how the Sinhala society recognized the Freedom
of Speech before the concept was developed by the civilized West as a
Fundamental Right. On the other hand, many publications in the media and
in the internet refer to Sri Lankan government as a ”Sinhala
(chauvinist) government” and security forces of the state as the
‘Sinhala Army’ when in fact there are so many Muslims, Malays Burghers
and an occasional Tamil serving in these forces. Did anybody or Mr.
Sumanthiran object to it in Parliament saying this is hardly the way to
talk about these things if one was keen promote reconciliation? Can
reconciliation be advanced only form oneside?
It will be interesting to know what the TNA has so far done to
promote reconciliation during the last three years. Is picking up and
blowing such a non-issue to mountainous proportions in a place like the
Parliament the way to clear the obstructions to reconciliation? In a way
it is a good thing that he expressed this view. Now we know the kind of
mindset that obstructs reconciliation who needs help.
The next issue he has raised is the “Removal of Tamil officers from Tamil areas and appointing persons who have no proficiency in Tamil will not advance as has happened yesterday to the GA Vavunia. This follows, (from) some time ago the appointment of the GA of Mannar. We protested.”
The next issue he has raised is the “Removal of Tamil officers from Tamil areas and appointing persons who have no proficiency in Tamil will not advance as has happened yesterday to the GA Vavunia. This follows, (from) some time ago the appointment of the GA of Mannar. We protested.”
Why? Are these places not parts of Sri Lanka? All Sinhala SLAS
officers are required to pass a test in Tamil conversation and reading
as far as I know (subject to correction) and vice versa for Tamil and
Muslim officers, before their confirmation. So what is their problem in
serving the people in these areas? We know several non-Tamil GAs who
have excelled in Jaffna such as Somapala Gunadheera who even in his
retirement writes so much with great understanding of the local problems
of Tamil people. Then we had Lionel Fernando who endeared himself so
much to the Jaffna people that when his mother died there, they insisted
that her funeral be held there and it was done.
We also have the case of Neville Jayaweera. who excelled as GA both
in Jaffna and later in Vavunia in difficult times. Also comes to mind
the name of Wimal Amarasekera who was extremely popular. Kingsley
Wickramesuriya, one time DIG Northern Province, has many Tamil friends
who visit him yet in Colombo. So what is the big deal here? There was
Mr. Senadheera of Sri Lanka Customs mostly posted in the North who was
fluent in Tamil. Why cannot we resume the same relationships that were
there, at least now? Then we recall having Tamil SAS officers as GA
Galle and Hambantota.
No one even realized they were Tamils! They got on famously with the people there. There are very senior Tamil Public Servants holding important positions in Colombo. Until recently Mr. Logesvaran held the important position of Secretary to the National Police Commission. Nobody had any problem of dealing with him just because he was a Tamil. So where is the problem? Who is trying to keep the two communities apart deliberately but the politicians? They will have no platform to stand on if these relationships with the common people are restored.
No one even realized they were Tamils! They got on famously with the people there. There are very senior Tamil Public Servants holding important positions in Colombo. Until recently Mr. Logesvaran held the important position of Secretary to the National Police Commission. Nobody had any problem of dealing with him just because he was a Tamil. So where is the problem? Who is trying to keep the two communities apart deliberately but the politicians? They will have no platform to stand on if these relationships with the common people are restored.
Mr. S further goes on to state, “We have consistently protested about
the fact the Government agent of Trincomalee is also a person, who has
no proficiency in Tamil, and worse he is a retired Military man.” Is a
retired military man disqualified to be GA Jaffna or in any other place?
To my recollection, during the UNP times the GA of Gampaha was also
retired Military man. There were no protests. He did not do any
injustice to anyone. Trinco is a special case. The present GA’s
predecessor, a civilian, was killed in his office one evening. So may be
one needs a military man to hold the place for some time. For, it was
only a few weeks ago that it was reported that an EPDP man was killed by
three LTTE Terrorists who had crept into the area from Tamil Nadu. The
intelligence services had been reporting that there were many Terrorists
who had not surrendered, hiding in Trincomalee District.
So these may be some of the considerations to have a military man as
GA Trinco for the moment. As regards his alleged lack of proficiency in
Tamil, I believe the population in Trinco District consists of almost
equal proportions of Tamil, Sinhala and Muslim people. I am sure the GA
may be having the services of Tamil interpreters to help him. After all,
the British who manned these positions for over a century knew neither
Tamil nor Sinhala. They still did well. There administrative reports
demonstrate that they had enormous concern for the people and their
problems.
Mr. S goes on to say: “Only two provinces in this country have as
their governors retired military personnel – that’s the North and the
East. Why is that?” Let me give the probable reason. Jaffna, Mannar and
Trincomalee are places where the GAs were murdered by LTTE Terrorists.
It may be that the government feels it prudent to have retired military
men instead of military men in active service, to have a supervisory
cover for some more time. The government, with their Intelligence
Services, are the best judges to decide on this. For unlike the
politicians, they are institutionally responsible to hold the hard won
peace in this country. Perhaps if there was a re-emergence of violence,
the TNA could take cover behind the Terrorists like they did the last
time. But a government cannot afford to do that.
Now that we are on this subject we may also deal with the agitation
by TNA and interested parties including those abroad, to have the
Military Camps removed particularly from the Northern Province. Why is
this? Is the NP not a part of this country? It is left to the military
to decide in what parts of the country they could set up camps according
to the strategic security needs of the country. Accordingly they locate
their camps in different parts of the country. There are Tamils living
in some of these areas too. But nobody protests. The protest comes only
form the Northern Province. What is special about Northern Province?
Of course from time to time Military personnel have gone on a spree
of violence owing to local reasons even in the Southern Province – that
too on a reduced scale now. But that is not a reason to ask closing down
a military camp and go berserk in the internet news channels? The US
could least afford to ask Sri Lanka where to locate her military camps
when according to today’s (22/5) Island, they have 176 military bases,
not even in their own country, but all over the world, ostensibly to
protect themselves against Terrorists! Besides does it happen in any
part of the world, including Tamil Nadu where a section of the people
object to the presence of the bases of their national army in their
midst?
Mr. S then refers to the violation of the constitution by the
government. This is not any way to defend or otherwise the games that
the government plays with the constitution. But here too there are some
reservations. Mr. S remonstrates the government on their failure to
fully implement the 13th Amendment. Many people have written that the
13th Amendment is a flawed piece of legislation and a standing insult to
the honor of an independent country. I do not wish to expand on it as
much has been said in this subject. Most people feel that the government
should not proceed any further on this matter without formally
consulting the people, at least at this late stage. In regard to
violation of the constitution, my point is that the TNA can least afford
to talk on this subject.